#1671 - Bret Weinstein & Dr. Pierre Kory cover

#1671 - Bret Weinstein & Dr. Pierre Kory

NaN minutesEpisode #1671
Bret WeinsteinDr. Pierre Kory

Dr. Pierre Kory is an ICU and lung specialist who is an expert on the use of the drug ivermectin to treat COVID-19. Bret Weinstein is an evolutionary biologist, visiting fellow at Princeton, host of the DarkHorse podcast, and co-author (with his wife, Heather Heying) of the forthcoming "A Hunter-Gatherer's Guide to the 21st Century."

Episode Timestamps

  • Discussion on COVID Treatment Protocols and Expertise on Ivermectin

    • Introduction to Dr. Corey and his expertise as a lung and ICU specialist in developing COVID treatment protocols
    • Brett and Heather's early involvement in podcasting about COVID
    • Exploration of ivermectin as a potential treatment for COVID and the initial indications from bench studies
  • YouTube Strikes and Censorship Issues Related to Medical Information

    • Analysis of YouTube's strikes on channels discussing medical topics and their vague guidelines on misinformation
    • Discussion on diverging guidance from major health agencies like the WHO and CDC
    • Challenges faced in discussing medical information on platforms like YouTube and potential consequences
  • Debate on Airborne Transmission of Virus

    • Discussion on the varying views between CDC and WHO regarding the virus transmission being airborne
    • Importance of understanding different modes of virus transmission (direct contact, droplet, airborne)
    • Critique on delay in recognizing airborne transmission by certain health organizations
  • Misinformation vs. Disinformation in Pandemic Narratives

    • Highlighting the tactics of disinformation used when science contradicts interests of certain entities
    • Comparison between misinformation and disinformation within pandemic narratives
    • Role of conspiracy theories and suppression of inconvenient scientific findings
  • Questioning Official Narratives and Scientific Consensus

    • Discussion on disinformation and stigmatizing those questioning official narratives
    • Emphasis on the importance of challenging scientific consensus with evidence
    • Critique of censorship and reliance on official positions rather than scientific consensus
  • Censorship and Rational Discussion

    • Criticism of censorship on platforms like YouTube restricting open discussion
    • Support for rational discussion based on facts and scientific evidence
    • Highlighting the dangers of limiting discussions on potential treatments like Ivermectin
  • Misinformation and Skepticism Around Pandemic Data

    • Discussion on skepticism towards agencies during the pandemic due to lack of transparency and good science
    • Exploration of discrepancies in official statements regarding airborne transmission and lab leak theories
    • Importance of seeking information from independent, objective experts for credibility and truth
  • Ivermectin Evidence and Building Consensus

    • Analysis of ivermectin effectiveness amidst noise in the data and need for proper interpretation
    • Importance of meta-analyses for pooling data and indicating effectiveness of ivermectin
    • Discussion on the history, discoveries, and potential broad antiviral effects of ivermectin
  • Discussion on Ivermectin, Evidence, and Criticisms

    • Meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials show significant positive impact of Ivermectin against COVID
    • Criticism of skeptics' approach to evidence standards and reluctance to use Ivermectin early in treatment
    • Analysis of the implications of relying solely on large-scale randomized controlled trials
  • Effectiveness and Potential of Ivermectin

    • Recent meta-analysis finds Ivermectin to reduce death rates by 62%
    • Discussion on the significant potential of Ivermectin for early treatment resulting in further reduction in hospitalization and death
    • Exploration of prophylactic use of Ivermectin showing an 86% reduction in COVID-19 infections
  • Discussion on the Effectiveness of Ivermectin in Preventing COVID

    • Debate on the importance of allowing the drug to cross into the bloodstream for COVID prevention purposes
    • Significant emphasis on the success rates of preventive trials using ivermectin
    • Exploration of the impact of combining ivermectin with another molecule in achieving near-perfect prevention
  • Challenges and Resistance in Acceptance of Ivermectin for COVID Treatment

    • Discussion on the consistent positive outcomes of trials supporting the use of ivermectin in COVID treatment
    • Addressing the resistance from authorities and agencies towards acknowledging the evidence supporting ivermectin
    • Evidence of bias and disinformation surrounding the assessment of ivermectin's efficacy by various organizations
  • The Search for Effective Antivirals Against COVID-19

    • Researchers initially tested existing antivirals in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19
    • Remdesivir emerges as the only antiviral drug with clear benefits, gaining FDA approval
    • Discussion on the $3 billion initiative led by Anthony Fauci to find new drugs against COVID
  • Pharmaceutical Industry, Ivermectin, and Treatment Anomalies

    • Critique of pharmaceutical interests driving treatment recommendations
    • Advocacy for ivermectin as an effective antiviral and its inexpensive nature
    • Mexico's success story with a nationwide ivermectin program and significant reduction in hospitalizations
  • Ivermectin's Impact in Various Countries

    • Discussion about the positive outcomes witnessed in Mexico, Argentina, and India after the adoption of Ivermectin
    • Mention of significant reduction in hospitalizations, deaths, and ICU usage in the mentioned countries
    • Insight into the ongoing controversy and political resistance faced despite the favorable results
  • Ivermectin as a Potential Solution and Response to Variants

    • Examination of Ivermectin's effectiveness against different variants like the Delta and UK variants based on epidemiological data
    • Assurance that there is no evidence suggesting Ivermectin is ineffective against any variants so far
    • Addressing skepticism and opposition towards Ivermectin despite promising results and tangible benefits
  • Controversy Around Ivermectin and Publication Bias

    • Discussion on resistance to science around Ivermectin and the controversy surrounding its profitability
    • Issues raised regarding ivory tower syndrome and evidence-based maniacism in medical reviews
    • Critique of professional societies like IDSA for skepticism towards Ivermectin despite positive trial results
  • Censorship and Suppression of Discussions on Ivermectin

    • Observations on censorship surrounding discussions on Ivermectin in various platforms like YouTube
    • Instances of demonetization and removal of content related to Ivermectin by medical educators
    • Concerns over the suppression of information and the impact on open discussion and exploration of medical treatments
  • Controversy Over COVID-19 Response and Treatment

    • Discussion on the limits of discussions controlled by YouTube regarding COVID-19 solutions
    • Debate on the official policy of emphasizing vaccines over other potential treatments like ivermectin
    • Criticism of the approach to vaccination and censorship of alternative viewpoints
  • Medical Misinformation and Censorship

    • Exploration of censorship through the Trusted News Initiative on medical topics
    • Analogies highlighting questionable decisions in the pandemic response
    • Critique of Dr. Fauci's approach and calls for a reappraisal of available treatments
  • Controversy Surrounding Corticosteroid Treatment in ICU and Impact on Patient Care

    • Validation of corticosteroids as lifesaving treatment from the Oxford's recovery trial
    • Critique on the rigid adherence to trial protocols over patient-centered care in ICU settings
    • Discussion on the suppression of alternative treatments for COVID-19 like ivermectin due to profit motives
  • Efficacy of Ivermectin in Long COVID Patients and Potential Therapeutic Mechanisms

    • Ivermectin showing remarkable efficacy in long COVID patients with a wide range of symptoms
    • Discussion on the anti-viral and anti-inflammatory properties of ivermectin in treating long COVID
    • Importance of individualized dosing and duration in treating long COVID with ivermectin
  • Issues with Vaccine Design and Spike Protein Circulation

    • Discussion on how the spike protein was modified to be more visible to the immune system
    • Explanation of the failures of the vaccines at various levels
    • Concerns about the spike protein circulating in the body, potentially causing harm
  • Censorship and the Importance of Open Scientific Discussion

    • Critical analysis of potential corporate behavior after immunization from liability
    • Conversation around censorship and the dangers of limiting scientific discourse
    • Importance of open discussion in the scientific community for better understanding and solutions
  • Debate on Censorship of Science and Medicine

    • Discussion about the censorship of debates on science and medicine by credible physicians using data
    • Concerns raised about limiting the ability of individuals to think for themselves and assess information on medicines
    • Exploration of the impact of censorship during a pandemic and urgent decision-making processes
  • Debate on Public Health, Combination Therapy, and Misinformation

    • Consideration of the distinction between public health strategies and the science of human health
    • Explanation of the utilization of combination therapy protocols in treating severe cases of diseases like COVID-19
    • Critique of how platforms and public health officials may limit scientific discussions while disseminating information
  • Debating the Efficacy of Ivermectin and Criticizing WHO Guidelines

    • Discussion regarding the low-quality evidence argument against using Ivermectin
    • Critique of WHO's guideline document and the omission of evidence supporting the efficacy of Ivermectin
    • Challenges to the arguments against the use of Ivermectin being labeled as scientific sophistry
  • Censorship Issues and Global Responses to Ivermectin Usage

    • Concerns raised about censorship in discussing scientific ideas and data interpretation
    • Examples of successful implementation of Ivermectin in various countries like India and Zimbabwe
    • Acknowledgment of the necessity to follow evidence-based approaches in public health decisions
© Copyright 2024, All Rights Reserved, created by @mr_johnnybgoode